Note-taking method
Best Linking Your Thinking for Software Engineers
Build a networked thought system through deliberate link-making. For software engineers, the working week is losing context between code reviews, incident postmortems, and technical research. The rest of this page is the method, cut for that week.
By tentus team · Updated 2026-09-20
What Linking Your Thinking actually asks of you
Make the link while the connection is hot — thinking happens in the linking, not in later reorganization.
A home note acts as launchpad, and pockets of related notes get pulled up by the task in front of you, not by category. The test of a good session is that you left a trail you'd want to walk again.
How software engineers put it to work
- 1
Decisions at review time, not after
The architecture decision is captured when the review happens — the alternatives rejected, the constraint that decided it — while the reasoning is still in the room. ADRs written from memory a month later are fiction.
- 2
Postmortem seeds during the incident
Notes start while the incident is live: what was tried, what the dashboards said, what the timeline was. Linked to past incidents, they turn "didn't this happen before?" from folklore into retrieval.
- 3
Research trails that survive the tab
RFC reading and bug hunts leave a linked trail — the Stack Overflow answer, the commit that explained the behavior, the doc that contradicted it. Next time the same error appears, the trail is one search away.
The capture habit, the linking, and the retrieval are the parts tentus automates — linking your thinking without the daily upkeep.
Try it with tentus
tentus makes Linking Your Thinking practical for software engineers. Capture, link, and retrieve without the busywork.
Other methods worth trying
Linking Your Thinking for other roles
Product Managers
juggling research, specs, stakeholder feedback, and launch plans across multiple tools.
Designers
scattered moodboards, design critiques, and research that never gets referenced again.
Researchers
drowning in PDFs and citations with no way to connect findings across projects.
Writers
notes spread across drafts, interviews, and research that should connect but don't.